Politics

Grasping The Nettle: On Labour’s Substance

Distinguised, innee?

“If I seem happy, it’s because I believe that we can show people, against the odds, and the odds have been against us, that we can come through.” This from Gordon Brown in a sympathetic interview with Ginny Dougary in today’s Times Magazine. This is very much Labour’s task in this election campaign and, as I noted last week, just getting to the point where people are willing to give this message a moment’s notice has been a considerable achievement for the party. Still, the polls in the last week have shown an increase in the Tory lead – still not the increase they need to form a majority government, but enough to be the largest party in a Hung Parliament.

Thus, perhaps, Lord Adonis’s plea to Liberal Democrat voters in yesterday’s Independent. It’s too early in the campaign to call for strategic voting, however, and any appearance that the Lib Dems are closet lefties will only help the Tories in seats in the south of England. Still, it formed at least part of the noises off – coming from both Brown and Lord Mandelson – that Labour might be willing to do business in a Hung Parliament. If, as the polls currently suggest, the Tories (to Cameron’s discredit) succeed only in becoming the largest party – and they aren’t achieving majority-winning swings even in the marginals – could the Lib Dems really prop up Labour? Surely not. This is an election campaign in which Labour must provide a strength of argument, not a sleight of hand.

The start of something like this came in the Mirror earlier in the week, but accusing the Tories of simply not knowing what they’re doing isn’t enough – although Philip Stephens’s analysis in the FT of the substance and strength necessary in an incoming government might, if reapplied to Brown’s clear strengths (even the marginals rate him higher than Cameron on all key leadership indices), could come to be allied with that ‘incompetent’ attack into a clear statement of the need for a Labour fourth term. Andrew Grice is right in today’s Independent to point out the naked self-interest of business leaders in supporting the Tory policy on curbing rises in National Insurance; Labour should waft the smell of that rat as much as they can – not least because the NI policy is so small, so trifling an issue, that it should be met not as a defensive scrap over a pre-announced policy, but as a chance to engage in substantive philosophical debate.

The manifestos are published next week – perhaps that’s what Labour are waiting for. But Dougary’s conclusion in that interview shows Labour the way forward: “[Brown] is a man of substance in a shallow age. So the question is – will we get the prime minister we deserve?” This election should not be a referendum on Gordon Brown – business trust Mandelson, voters like Darling, Miliband has sound, progressive ideas – but the party he leads has every chance to call Cameron’s Conservatives on shallow policymaking which is not informed by the values which have made Britain, if far from perfect and at times overly authoritarian, a better place over the last 13 years. It’s not worth squabbling over minutiae.

Advertisements
Standard

2 thoughts on “Grasping The Nettle: On Labour’s Substance

  1. Hey there Dan,

    As you said before it’s ‘Interesting times’ that we’re in right now.

    The Lib Dems question is popping up more and more, it seems. Personally I think Nick Clegg is reluctant about working with Labour. This is probably because his history is more traditionally ‘Liberal’ than social democrat (something I bring up in my latest blog. nice plug, there). Though I think Clegg is more anti Labour than pro Tory. That been said I think a small majority of the Lib Dems would certainly rather do a deal with Labour. However I think it’s irrelevent as I’m inclined to beleive they’d strike a deal with whoever’s the largest. It is interesting though, how they’re suddenly playing down the importance of PR as a deal cruncher…

    Catho

  2. danhartland says:

    It is interesting though, how they’re suddenly playing down the importance of PR as a deal cruncher…

    It’s been subsumed into a broader ‘cleaning up politics’ message, yes – but they can’t stop going on about it all the same. Lord Rennard, in a debate with Peter Hain about tactical voting on Newsnight just now, was strongly advocating it, and attacking Labour for not adopting it yet. Earlier, Vince Cable had delivered a coy answer about core principles, though, which boiled down to ‘we’d like to talk to someone about the four boxes on our front cover’.

    On the subject of whom they’ll be talking to … frankly, the manifesto as published today has very little in common with the Tory one published yesterday, despite as you rightly note Clegg’s more right-wing tendencies. On the basis of the direction of travel, I’m not at all sure how a Lib Dem/Tory coalition could work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s