History

The People Opposed The King’s Party?

A Typical Socialist Scene

A Typical Socialist Scene

An addendum to my post of last week about blogging, history and relevancy: Chris Thompson posts about a rather strange review by Will Podmore of Michael Braddick’s God’s Fury England’s Fire, published in Tribune (itself the focus of some interest today). I wrote some very brief thoughts on the book some time ago, and suffice to say I share Thompson’s surprise at the review. It is thoroughly partial, cherry-picking quotes with abandon, to the extent that that I don’t recognise the book as Podmore characterises it.

This is all well and good editorially – the review plays to the gallery, emphasising why Braddick’s book might interest the readership of Tribune. The problem is, it is a book which rejects such a partial reading of the past. The review concludes, “It was “a decade of intense debate and spectacular intellectual creativity… the beginnings of a passage from the world of Reformation to the world of Enlightenment’.” This and the rest of the piece makes it sound like Braddick has a single vision of the period as a time of radical revolt, which entirely misrepresents the whole “conclusionless” thrust of the book.

As if the reminder was necessary, you can go too far with the relevancy thing.

Advertisements
Standard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s