Posted by: danhartland on: February 27, 2012
One of the most famous opening scenes in English literature – the graveyard, the prison ship, the convict – boils down to the provenance of a pie. What strikes the episodic reader of Great Expectations, as opposed perhaps to the one barrelling through the volume in one go, is the sustained low comedy – almost the satire [...]
Posted by: danhartland on: February 21, 2012
Others have already had at Jonathan Franzen’s recent swivel-eyed New Yorker piece on Edith Wharton so that I don’t have to. Here’s Sarah Todd, who says what needs to be said very well: Ostensibly he’s talking about Wharton’s appearance because it’s her “one potentially redeeming disadvantage.” But he doesn’t sound sympathetic when he talks about [...]
Posted by: danhartland on: February 11, 2012
I read The Cold Six Thousand. I thought about The Cold Six Thousand. I figured The Cold Six Thousand was fucked up. It was rough. James Ellroy wrote a novel. He’s written a bunch. The Cold Six Thousand is the sequel to American Tabloid but it isn’t a repeat. It sometimes reads like one. But it [...]
Posted by: danhartland on: February 9, 2012
Manflu did it for Osama. I speak not of an alternative history in which the mastermind of 9/11 was struck low by fatigue and fever, but of the post I had intended to write about Lavie Tidhar’s BSFA-shortlisted novel: a fug of the last few days has led not just to an inability to write [...]
Posted by: danhartland on: February 1, 2012
Despite my thoughts on Dickens-as-novelist yesterday, I try to avoid deciding what a novel should be – its singular benefit over other forms is, after all, surely its expansiveness. But my sense that Dickens’s didacticism is somehow at odds with what I understand to be the open-heartedness of the novel form was in part inspired [...]
Chatter @#71